Zdenek Kolar vs Facundo Diaz Acosta Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Oct at 10:26 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Z. Kolar vs F. Diaz Acosta

CZE
1
Win
Played
1
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Kolar 1 - 1 Acosta
They have played 4 sets in total, with Zdenek Kolar winning 2 and Facundo Diaz Acosta winning 2. The last match between Facundo Diaz Acosta and Zdenek Kolar was at the Costa do Sauipe Challenger, 20-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Facundo Diaz Acosta getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kolar | 1 |
| Acosta | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Costa do Sauipe Challenger(10-20-25)
(QF) Poznan Challenger(06-22-23)
Z. Kolar vs F. D. Acosta H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $388,240 | Career Prize Money | $611,865 |
| 56.68% (441-337) | Career Total W/L | 60.00% (228-152) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 12 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.50% (3-5) |
Z. Kolar vs F. D. Acosta Match Preview:
- Facundo Diaz Acosta has a slight edge in recent second serve performance, winning 45.59% of points compared to Zdenek Kolar's 43.23%. Could this advantage impact the match outcome? It might, given its correlation with match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats favor Acosta slightly again, winning 46.35% of opponents' second serve points; Kolar trails with 45.41%. On first serve returns, Acosta leads with 27.20% over Kolar's 26.36%.
- Under pressure, Acosta better handles breakpoints, saving 59.59%, compared to Kolar's 54.51%—a crucial edge in tight games.
- Kolar has a superior win rate over the past year, clinching 66.33% of matches, whereas Acosta won 51.35%. Does this indicate Kolar's overall stronger form?
- Both players excel on clay, each with a 63% career win rate. However, Kolar has a significant number of wins compared to Acosta.
- Kolar's match experience at higher tournament levels shows in his dominating win percentage (65.38%) over Acosta's (60.00%) on the same circuit.
- Head-to-head, Kolar has consistently bested Acosta, winning their solitary match decisively in straight sets.
- Acosta has faced tougher opponents, with an average ranking of 182.95, yet Kolar's lower-ranked opposition hasn't stopped him from securing more victories.
- In decisive sets, Kolar demonstrates resilience, winning 62% compared to Acosta's 38%.
- Current event performance should also be considered, as some players improve as tournaments progress.
Editorial Prediction (October 20, 2025, UTC):
Facundo Diaz Acosta holds a marginal advantage in second serve success and breakpoint management. These factors might swing a close contest in his favor.
Zdenek Kolar, however, appears stronger overall with a better match win rate, consistency in head-to-head encounters, and proven mental strength in decisive situations.
Ultimately, Kolar's ability to harness match-tight conditions and his endurance in deciding sets suggest he could emerge victorious again in this upcoming match against Acosta.
Zdenek Kolar vs Facundo Diaz Acosta Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Z. Kolar vs F. D. Acosta H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 16 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:22:0 | Average Match Time | 1:22:0 |
| 57% (55/96) | 1st Serve % | 69% (74/107) |
| 62% (34/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (52/74) |
| 46% (19/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (11/33) |
| 29% (4/14) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 41% (44/107) | Return Points Win % | 45% (43/96) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Z. Kolar Recent Matches Played
F. D. Acosta Recent Matches Played

Z. Kolar vs F. D. Acosta Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.68% (441/337) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.00% (228/152) |
| 54.98% (982/804) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.71% (519/365) |
| 51.93% (8719/8072) | Games Win/Loss | 53.58% (4498/3897) |
| 39.06% (25/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (28/28) |
| 59.93% (320/214) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.09% (200/117) |
| 54.17% (91/77) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2080 | Aces Total | 1008 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1875 | Total Double Faults | 1240 |
| 1:29:38 | Average Match Time | 1:48:39 |
| 521.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.59 |
| 62% (30286/48982) | 1st Serve % | 58% (15119/25864) |
| 67% (20356/30286) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (10374/15119) |
| 50% (9295/18706) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5461/10745) |
| 44% (2242/5045) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1245/2864) |
| 41% (20071/48865) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10943/26114) |
| 41.86% (18/25) | Slam W/L | 29.41% (5/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 42.11% (8/11) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (25/25) |
| 52.35% (245/223) | Challenger W/L | 62.43% (113/68) |
| 68.55% (170/78) | Futures W/L | 67.74% (84/40) |
| 57% (433/766) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (224/364) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 50% (103/208) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (58/117) |
| 55% (127/231) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (64/124) |
| 88% (437/385) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (238/196) |
| 12% (437/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (238/42) |
| 16% (341/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (141/33) |